An Electric Eco-Friendly Rolls-Royce?

April 23rd, 2011

Yes for a  few million bucks you can have one too, at least a prototype. Who would have thought someone with that kind of extra green cash would give much thought to a fuel saving eco-lux land yacht. Well apparently some do. In a 4-23-2011 Wall Street Journal, titled The Face of Green, the paper cited the 6,000 pound, battery operated, e-machine by Rolls-Royce.  The article claims even wealthy auto buyers have a multitude of motivations including being socially conscious and concerned about the earth. Read the full story.

Eco-friendly automobiles will continue be hot new offering from all the auto maker as all income consumer sectors seem to be desiring to be more responsible citizens, buy green and consume less fuel.

But, just how green will the auto buying market go? Will they care about the sustainability and full-cycle of the product they are buying? Will they demand eco-friendly flame retardants that could save their lives and will the release of carbon emissions from auto manufacturers be questioned?

Let’s hope so. Tell us what you think.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Conflict vs Collaboration

February 7th, 2011

Left vs Right. Democrats vs Republicans. Liberals vs Conservatives. Socialists vs Capitalists. Seem like everything these days is couched in terms of two sides, fighting it out. But in reality, collaboration is the source of most progress in today’s world. For example, today, green advocates and chemical companies are working together to give consumers fantastic new products that both protect the environment and protect lives, see previous post on new green innovations. Unfortunately, it doesn’t make the front pages because conflict sells newspapers. Too bad.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Not Your Father’s Chemical Company

January 28th, 2011

Green chemistry

Most of us were raised to think that certain industries are just a necessary evil, like chemical companies. Dirty, scary, and liable to put things in the ground, air or water that were not good for us.

In reality, many of these companies have not only joined the green revolution, some of them are actually leading it with new innovations and by investing millions of dollars in research. This dedication to find new solutions not only makes life better, but it is keeping us safe.

Here are just a few green technologies and initiatives from a new generation of chemical companies.
Albemarles‘ Earthwise division is making green flame retardant products that go into electronics and furniture to keep us safe from fires.

Eastman Chemical company bets on green chemistry and launches a material used to make plastic products that are free of bisphenol A (BPA).

Dow Chemicals commits to a five-year partnership with The Nature Conservancy. Its aim is to create a set of tools and methodologies other companies can use to integrate the economics of ecosystem services in business decision-making.

The lesson here is chemical companies and the innovations they contribute to society are vital to quality and healthy living. Just because we think something is true, it may not still be true.  Know the scientific facts, not just what someone may have told you.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Refurbished-Goods Industry Seeks Support for trade and R&D

January 25th, 2011

Seen in The Wall Street Journal 1/24.10.

Executives from some of the largest U.S. manufacturers are gathering in Washington Monday and Tuesday to seek more government support for their efforts to refurbish and sell used products ranging from cell phones to railroad locomotives to medical scanners.

Remanufacturers—including Caterpillar Inc., General Electric Co., General Motors Co., Eastman Kodak Co. and Xerox Corp.—would like the government to push harder for free global trade in reconditioned products and to help fund research into better methods of remanufacturing, which involves restoring used products to like-new condition for resale. Read full story.

Good idea? Bad idea?

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

“The Law of Unintended Consequences” Strikes Again!

January 10th, 2011
Eco man changes world with green chemistry

How many times do we read about laws that are passed with the best intentions, only to end up doing the opposite? Remember when Congress taxed yachts to try and get more money from rich people? They figured since only multi-millionaires buy yacht, this was a perfect way to get more money without hurting any poor or middle-class people. Uh, not quite. Turns out that the rich folks just bought their yachts overseas, and the poor and middle class folks who worked at the shipyards in the northeast US lost their jobs. Whoops!

Same thing is happening with so many called environmental laws. To protect us from what are claimed to be dangerous chemicals, activist are urging the outlawing of chemicals that are put into sofas and TV’s to keep them from burning. Problem is, without the chemical, people die in fires a lot more frequently.  http://tinyurl.com/2blx6nw>

Stop and think before you have a knee-jerk agreement with someone who says they are trying to protect you or help you with a new law or regulation. Often times the net result is not what they intend. And often it is the opposite.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

ACS Webinar-How Chemical Policy Reform Can Spur Green Chemistry

November 8th, 2010

As part of American Chemical Society ACS Webinars: Green Chemistry & Sustainability Series Richard Denison, Senior Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund will give a presentation entitled “How Chemical Policy Reform Can Spur Green Chemistry” followed by a Q&A period.

November 18th from 2-3 eastern time

Please note that this Webinar is open to everyone and not only to ACS Members.

In the wake of the largest Gulf oil disaster or public concern over the chemicals in a baby bottle, how will changing legislation affect chemical professionals? Public policy has the potential to transform the chemical industries and set a new course for the next decade. Join our speaker, Richard Denison, and learn about the latest Green Chemistry policy developments (Safe Chemicals Act/TSCA reform) and how they may affect chemical professionals, chemical industries, and the future of green chemistry.

What You Will Learn
- The policy context for advancing Green Chemistry essentials you need to know
- How U.S. and international policy changes can support the development and use of greener chemicals
- How current policy is informing future legislation – Safe Chemicals Act/TSCA reform
- And much more

To register and find more details:

Meet Your Expert
Richard A. Denison is a senior scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund. Dr. Denison has 25 years of experience in the environmental arena, specializing in chemicals policy and hazard, exposure, risk assessment and management for industrial chemicals and nanomaterials. He has published extensively and has testified before Congress many times regarding these issues.  Dr. Denison currently serves on the National Research Council’s Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology and on the Green Ribbon Science Panel for California’s Green Chemistry Initiative. He was a member of the National Pollution Prevention and Toxics Advisory Committee, which advised EPA’s toxics office.  Previously, Dr. Denison was an analyst and assistant project director in the Oceans and Environment Program, Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress. Dr. Denison received his Ph.D. in Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry from Yale University.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Manufacturers and Fire Safety Solution Suppliers Work Together to Increase Environmental Initiatives for Planet, Employers and Consumers

October 26th, 2010

Our Green lab from earthwise - VECAP

Meet Danielle Goossens, Global Product Stewardship Director
Meet the EarthWise Team is a series of inspirational and often untold stories about the people behind important solutions, technologies and products that make our lives better and safer every day.

The series presents some of the key scientists and business professionals who have contributed to the development, progress and implementation of the green chemistry products, processes and principles of Albemarle and the Earthwise brand.

Albemarle Corporation, headquartered in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, is a leading global developer, manufacturer, and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals for consumer electronics, petroleum refining, utilities, packaging, construction, automotive/transportation, pharmaceuticals, crop protection, food-safety and custom chemistry services.

Earthwise™ is a new division of Albemarle Corporation. The brand represents a family of products that follows strict environmental-friendly standards, along with practicing green chemistry principles and include new green fire safety alternatives to existing fire safety solutions.

Albemarle is the global leader in flame retardants. Flame retardants or fire safety solutions that are critical ingredients in many consumer electronic products, as well as the interiors of automobiles and airplanes, save lives and protect property from fires.

A group of manufacturers of flame retardants launched an initiative to raise awareness of best practices in chemical handling processes among the companies that utilize these flame retardants. Let’s learn more about the Voluntary Emissions Control Action Programme (VECAP) from Danielle Goossens, Global Product Stewardship Director at Albemarle, who is based in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Danielle, tell us about your role at Albemarle and the VECAP program
I am Danielle Goossens and I direct health, safety and environmental issues for Albemarle in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, except for manufacturing plants. I make sure the company is in compliance with the regulations in all the countries we serve. I also manage product stewardship worldwide. Which means I advise customers, who are themselves manufacturers, on the best ways to handle the products they purchase from us and how to avoid any environmental releases.

I received my undergraduate and doctorate degrees from the Catholic University of Louvain (Belguim) in 1979. I have worked mainly in research at the University and at Belgian pharmaceutical companies. In 1992, I joined Ethyl (which later spun off its chemical businesses as Albemarle) as an analytical chemist. I then moved to the Customer Technical Service area and assumed my current role in 2008.

What exactly is VECAP? How does it affect consumers and businesses?
As a voluntary program that promotes best practices for the handling of flame retardant chemicals, VECAP has a rather pragmatic goal: to make sure the customers are using the product safely at every stage. Albemarle and other flame retardant producers together acted on their concerns to limit the possible ways that these chemical products might enter the environment during manufacturing processes. In 2004, the companies launched this pioneering program. It’s highly unusual that the industry developed VECAP on its own, because often government regulators impose these kinds of standards on industry.

The three companies who formed VECAP are Albemarle Corporation, Chemtura Corporation and ICL-IP. Together, they sell to more than 500 customers worldwide. In 2009, the members of VECAP surveyed more than 135 sites in Europe, and perhaps another 100 each in North America and the Asia/Pacific regions. The number continues to grow in 2010, of course. At each company, there are between three and eight professionals (engineers, scientists, technical and advocacy staff) involved in the efforts, as well as third-party independent consultants.

By adhering to the best practices advocated by VECAP in sensitive areas, the makers of the plastic products and components that use flame retardants will reduce the potential contamination of food, air, water and earth. Plus, they limit their own employees’ and, downstream, consumers’ exposure to chemicals.

Additionally, there is a certification component; Bureau Veritas is an independent auditor that will certify a company is VECAP compliant and a seal can be placed on their website and packaging. Albemarle’s Magnolia plant, which is the principal facility in the US that produces brominated flame retardants, has been certified.

Finally, it is important to note the methodology for the initiative is a model that has already been adopted for other products by several chemical companies and can be modified for use by manufacturers in other industries.

How do you work with customers to let them know about VECAP?
We conduct a survey in a face-to-face meeting with the customer who purchases our flame retardant solutions. We ask about certain practices and calculate the potential chemical emissions. We then share with them the best practices and perform a separate calculation for the emissions that would be produced by following these new procedures. In some cases, the difference is astonishing and customers are surprised to learn by how much they might lower their emissions and be eco-friendly to the earth and workplace, while making these simple changes.

For example, the area that can have the greatest impact on emission reductions is the handling and disposal of packaging. Albemarle delivers the flame retardant powder to the customer either in small paper bags or in polypropylene supersacs. The paper bag-type of package holds 25 kilograms. We determined that, in the process of emptying the package, there was a waste factor of 150 grams in each one.

In contrast, we suggest a 1,000 kilogram polypropylene bag, something that is 40 times larger, yet it has a remarkably lower waste factor: compare 500 grams remaining in the large bag to 6,000 grams for the many smaller ones. Customers immediately recognize the impact of the amount of product that is purchased and not wasted:

When it comes to disposing of the packaging, whether paper or polypropylene, we encourage our customers to incinerate the bags or to bury them in a chemically controlled landfill.

In many countries, it does not cost any more to implement this best practice and the payoffs in reduced waste and safer operations are obvious, as is the positive impact on the environment.

Please tell us about VECAP’s other areas of best practices in the next blog post.
That will be my pleasure.

  • Share/Bookmark

8 Comments »

Albemarle Achieves Record Quarterly Earnings

October 25th, 2010

Third quarter 2010 highlights:

  • Achieved record quarterly earnings of $1.02 per share, up nearly 80 percent over third quarter 2009 results.
  • Net sales increased 14 percent from prior year’s quarter to $585 million.
  • Outstanding operating performance with strong year-over-year profit growth across all three segments, including record segment income for Polymer Solutions and Catalysts for the third consecutive quarter.
  • Strong cash generation leading to cash and cash equivalents of $425 million at quarter end.
  • Achieved record EBITDA performance of $151 million and record EBITDA margin of 25.8 percent.

You can learn more details at the Albemarle site.

  • Share/Bookmark

1 Comment »

4 Business Books to Help Capitalize on Green Revolution

October 12th, 2010

The environmental revolution and “going green” get talked about a lot, but what do these phrases really mean? Honest and sincere companies that embrace sustainability in side and out want to avoid greenwashing, or faking an environmental consciousness and commitment. Understanding and executing smart for business and the earth can be a challenge. We’ve spotlighting four books that do a good job of addressing how businesses can employ genuine change for the good of the environment — and profit from it.

Capitalism at the Crossroads, by Stuart L. Hart
Our Green Lab Top 4 green books - Capitalism at the Crossroads, Stuart Hart

Capitalism at the Crossroads is a practical guide to changing your business. Drawing on his experience consulting with top companies and NGOs worldwide, Hart shows how to craft your optimal sustainability strategy and overcome the limitations of traditional “greening” approaches. He presents case studies from the United States and around the world, demonstrating what’s working and what isn’t. He also guides business leaders in building an organizational “infrastructure for sustainability”–one that can survive budgeting and boardrooms, recharging innovation and growth throughout your enterprise.

Cradle to Cradle, by William McDonough
Our Green Lab top 4 green books - Cradle to Cradle William McDonough

In Cradle to Cradle, the authors present a manifesto calling for a new industrial revolution, one that would render both traditional manufacturing and traditional environmentalism obsolete. Recycling, for instance, is actually “downcycling,” creating hybrids of biological and technical “nutrients” which are then unrecoverable and unusable. The authors, an architect and a chemist, want to eliminate the concept of waste altogether, while preserving commerce and allowing for human nature. They offer several compelling examples of corporations that are not just doing less harm–they’re actually doing good for the environment and their neighborhoods, and making more money in the process. Cradle to Cradle is a refreshing change from the intractable environmental conflicts that dominate headlines. It’s a handbook for 21st-century innovation and should be required reading for business hotshots and environmental activists.

Hot, Flat, and Crowded, by Thomas L. Friedman
Our Green Lab top 4 green books - Hot Flat and Crowded Thomas Friedman

Friedman explains how global warming, rapidly growing populations, and the astonishing expansion of the world’s middle class through globalization have produced a planet that is “hot, flat, and crowded.” Our resources are being strained to the limit, and changes must be made, primarily to our methods for creating and consuming energy. Making these changes will be a great challenge, Friedman explains, but also a great opportunity, and one that America cannot afford to miss. Hot, Flat, and Crowded provides the theoretical basis for American capitalism to  save the world — and itself.

Natural Capitalism, by Hawken, Lovins and Lovins
Our Green Lab top 4 green books - Natural Capitalism, Paul Hawken

In Natural Capitalism, three top strategists show how leading-edge companies are practicing “a new type of industrialism” that is more efficient and profitable while saving the environment and creating jobs. Paul Hawken and Amory and Hunter Lovins write that in the next century, cars will get 200 miles per gallon without compromising safety and power, manufacturers will relentlessly recycle their products, and the world’s standard of living will jump without further damaging natural resources. “Is this the vision of a utopia? In fact, the changes described here could come about in the decades to come as the result of economic and technological trends already in place,” the authors write.

Have you read a good eco-book recently? Please share with a comment here or in our Linkedin Green Lab group.

  • Share/Bookmark

2 Comments »

All Aboard the Eco-Innovation Express

October 5th, 2010

Eco-friendly news, information from Earthwise - green businesses

According to some observers, at the leading companies, the four Ps of Marketing — price, place, promotion, and product — have been supplanted by the triple bottom line of sustainability: profit, people and planet. The new mantra reflects business performance in terms of environmental and human/societal outcomes as well as financial results.

Let’s look at Eco-Innovation, the subject of commentary in Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

Unfortunately, for G. Michael Maddock and Raphael Louis Vitón, too many corporations and businesses are mired in thinking about environmental concerns from the perspective of mitigation: the company got into trouble, perhaps with pollution, and the day has arrived when the problem area has to be cleaned up and remediated.

This defensive posture precludes looking at incorporating environmentally sound practices on a company-wide basis, from generating ideas for a product, to sourcing the materials to the very processes that create it, package it and bring it to the marketplace.

Here are some examples from the Maddock and Vitón story, plus some others that have embraced eco-innovation:

DuPont  and other chemical companies have transformed their products and processes with the principles of green chemistry, effectively reducing its environmental impact and the production and use of hazardous substances. A lesser-known company called Albemarle provides fire safety solutions for the electronics, auto and aviation sectors, under the Earthwise brand. Albemarle recently introduced an eco-friendly flame retardant that is non-bioaccumulative and recyclable. The fire safety solution is organically based, rather than mineral-based. It is a polymer, which means the chemical is too large to be absorbed by the body or animal life.

GE has fashioned Ecomagination, an initiative that responds to consumer demand “for cleaner and more energy-efficient product” that also will generate revenue growth for the company.

At Nike, sustainability is the responsibility of all employees, and every product is subject to a sustainability analysis.
Finally, IBM holds a periodic Global Eco-Efficiency Jam, a brainstorming session with global participation over 48-hours to cook up new ideas. Let’s take this one step further and acknowledge the impact of time or money in the eco-innovation process.

Over what timeframe will these programs roll-out?

What are the expenses and the potential cost-savings of embracing this approach?

What are expectations for the internal rate of return?

What are the opportunity costs of delaying its implementation — or of being distracted by other operational programs?

Recognizing that these situations will vary between companies and industries, they remain vital considerations in embarking on an eco-innovation strategy.

Perhaps a first step is to conduct a sustainability audit, as discussed in the next blog post.

  • Share/Bookmark

1 Comment »