Good Science – the Cure for Better Living

March 16th, 2012

Today, we take for granted that our medicines and juices are pure, our meat does not harbor bacteria and many consumer products may be used safely.

Standards for health and safety have been established by credible scientific research. Everyone relies on the precise analysis of chemists and other scientists to give us peace of mind when using countless products every day. This safety was not always the case.

In the 1920s, it was common for companies to use mercury in laxatives. Under the then-ineffectual Federal Drug Administration, manufacturers did not list the ingredients in their products. Nor were they required to test their products for safe usage. Consumers, and even the drug-makers themselves, were unaware of any hidden poisons.

Contemporary scientists analyzed the biochemical effects of substances found in the home and pharmacy. Their studies revealed that the mercury of the laxative medicine, for example, accumulated in the body and caused death.

The ground-breaking research of these scientists, who carefully built the model for forensic medicine, is the subject of The Poisoner’s Handbook by Deborah Blum.

The book recounts how, between 1918 and 1936, a team of doctors, chemists and toxicologists developed procedures that revealed how unsafe many medicines and consumer products were.

The importance of reliable scientific research, which occurs behind the scenes before products are brought to market, cannot be over-estimated. As reviewer Matthew Pearl states, The Poisoner’s Handbook will “transform the way you think about the power of science to . . . save our lives.”

For updated science stories, visit Deborah’s blog here.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Green Polymer Made From Biodiesel And Wine Products

January 18th, 2012

ScienceDaily — A team of undergraduate engineering students at Oregon State University has discovered that blending byproducts from biodiesel production and winemaking produces an environmentally friendly polymer that could one day replace polystyrene foam meat trays in supermarkets.

It may also be valuable in the manufacture of furniture, particle board, fire logs, insulation and even hair gel.

The process is so unique and potentially marketable that the students have applied for a patent to protect their intellectual property, said David Hackleman, the Linus Pauling Chair at the OSU College of Engineering.

“I’m delighted, but not totally surprised, that they can now add to their report the words ‘patent application pending,’” Hackleman said.

Christen Glarborg, Patrick O’Connor, Heather Paris and Alana Warner-Tuhy – all seniors studying chemical engineering – delved into combining glycerin, a byproduct of biodiesel production, and tartaric acid, a byproduct of wine production.

“When put together, those ingredients can make a hard, bubbly polymer,” Paris said.

In the 1880s, the same material was used in the making of varnishes and paints.

“It biodegrades in water,” said O’Connor. “Dr. Hackleman suggested we try to mold it into a tray, like to replace the foam trays under meat in the supermarket.”

But their first experiments resulted in a rock-hard mess: Think of cooking taffy too long, so that it sticks so hard, you have to throw the pot away. The young researchers persevered until they produced a more manageable glue, which they decided to try mixing with other byproducts such as sawdust and woodchips.

Voila! A material that was moldable, though somewhat tacky. So they popped it into an oven to see if it would firm up. It seemed they were possibly onto a particleboard for “green” building.

“Then we found that at 600 degrees, our polymer vaporized,” Paris said. “So we thought, how about ash-free logs or pellets for heating?”

While the students continued exploring possibilities, Hackleman knew enough about entrepreneurship to realize they should begin the process of protecting their intellectual property. He steered them to OSU’s Office of Technology Transfer, where their invention disclosure was brought to the stage of “patent pending.”

The students are now focused on testing and refining the polymer for strength and biodegradability. While it is not yet clear whether or not the technology will make it to commercialization, “it’s certainly a boost for the students,” Hackleman said.

The team won “Best Chemical Engineering Project” and was runner-up for “People’s Choice Award” at OSU’s eighth annual Engineering Expo in May. The team members displayed their research among more than 100 student design projects and product prototypes.

“Producing biodiesel produces a lot of glycerin,” Hackleman said. “Now it seems that even the waste from green industries can be put to another good use – one that can help in the solution to a global problem.”

For more information on green polymer, click here.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

White House Rejects EPA Proposal to Strengthen Smog Standards

September 19th, 2011

On Friday, September 2, 2011, the White House directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw and reconsider a proposal to strengthen National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone, the primary ingredient in smog. The announcement marked the first time that the Obama Administration formally returned one of its own agencies proposals, and it could indicate heightened executive scrutiny of forthcoming rules economic impacts. The heart of the Clean Air Act, NAAQS, set maximum levels for six criteria pollutants at levels necessary to protect public health and welfare, implemented through State Implementation Plans covering a broad range of  sources. The ozone NAAQS were last revised in 2008, when the Bush Administration set a primary standard of .075 parts-per-million (“ppm”�) — more lenient than the .06-.07 ppm range recommended by EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.

For more information on smog standards in your city view:
Top Toxic States, Who’s Doing New Studies?

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

Can Wal-Mart’s Green Index Make a Difference?

March 17th, 2011

By now most have heard that the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, is developing a green index for products. A look inside the project reveals four major areas of “green” measurement: (1) energy and climate, (2) natural resources, (3) material efficiency, and (4) people and community. Since “green” means a different thing to almost anyone you might talk to, Wal-Mart’s approach might just start to give some common definition to what has been a highly subjective term. Even more interesting is how all their individual products will rank, and then the certain debate that will follow over the relative strength and importance of each of the criteria. Further, products that rank low will not only have to look at their own manufacturing practices, but also those of their suppliers. It may indeed spur competition between suppliers to contribute the lowest amount on non-green attributes to the manufacturers –in other words, voluntary, bottom-up, market-based environmentalism. What a radical thought!

Do you think the development of Wal-Mart’s green products will strengthen their brand? Or will the competition between their future suppliers turn ugly?

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »

What Is The Cost of a Good Idea?

February 25th, 2011

When it comes to State or Federal governments making policies about health and safety issues, oftentimes it’s the emotional argument that is most persuasive. But for every perceived winner there may be many invisible losers. For example, when economist Henry Hazlitt points out that when a windstorm breaks 100 windows, the guy who fixes the windows gets a lot more business, thus increasing the net economic activity of the community. He may even have to hire someone to help him fix the windows. This creates “jobs.” So one could argue that the destructive windstorm is good for the economy! But hold on. The money that the homeowners spent on the window repairman now cannot be spent with the grocer, or the tailor, or the college, or the rent. These are the invisible victims of the windstorm, and their loss never gets factors into the equation.

When well-meaning rules, regulations or laws are instituted, it is imperative we fully explore the consequences of each one of them, including the hidden victims, not just the visible winners.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments »